Also known as: Rankmio Visibility Score, Visibility Score V2, V2 score
The Rankmio Visibility Index is the central metric in the dashboard. It combines four sources into a single value between 0 and 100: SERP visibility at 40 per cent, AI citations at 25, traffic at 20 and the backlink profile at 15. Classic visibility indices measure only the first of those four. Anyone who wants to know how visible a domain is today also has to answer whether it appears in AI answers, and a pure SERP metric cannot do that.
The second difference is how missing data is handled. A project without a backlink analysis reaches at most 85 points instead of 100, and the interface states that ceiling. A capped value therefore stays distinguishable from a poor one.
The total is the sum of the four contributions, not their average. If a source is missing, its share stays unfilled and is not redistributed. The weights are fixed and identical across all projects.
Everything rests on one quantity, visibility: the sum across all search terms of demand times the click probability of the position. A term in position 1 with 1,000 searches contributes 280, the same term in position 40 only 4.
That splits into two parts. The level (60 points) measures size, on a logarithmic scale up to an anchor of 3,000 expected clicks. The capture rate (40 points) measures quality: how much the domain extracts from its own demand compared with holding position 1 everywhere. The capture rate is independent of size, so a small provider with good positions scores as well as a large one.
Below 300 impressions a month the capture rate is not calculated, because with four impressions it would inevitably read as one hundred per cent. Those projects reach at most 60 of the 100 SERP points, and that cap is stated too.
Three sources, combined in this order.
The difference between adding and reconciling matters. Search Console and the position tracker describe the same search engine: if both report the same term, that is one ranking, not two. Bing is a different search engine, and whoever searches there is not the same person searching on Google. Netting those clicks against each other would cancel out real visibility.
Bing stays out of the capture rate. That part relates what was achieved to what was achievable and needs a complete population, but the Bing export only supplies the strongest queries.
The Sistrix Visibility Index uses the same principle for search visibility: position times search volume times expected click-through rate, summed up. The difference lies in the population. Sistrix measures weekly against a fixed keyword set of roughly one million terms per country, in place since 2008 and largely unchanged.
That fixed set is exactly what made the value a standard. When every domain is measured against the same list, their values are comparable with one another, and because the list barely changes, the trend stays readable across years. A kink appearing on the same day for many domains is a Google update, not a measurement error. Only an external observer with a fixed list can deliver that.
The price is coverage. A fixed list is necessarily head-heavy and does not know the long tail of any single site. For a small or highly specialised domain, Sistrix therefore often shows almost nothing even though the site works fine.
The two answer different questions, and neither replaces the other.
For comparing domains and spotting Google updates, Sistrix is clearly better. Rankmio cannot do that structurally: its index rests on the Search Console data of the individual project, so on a keyword set that differs for every domain. Holding two Rankmio values against each other makes no sense.
For the state of your own site, Rankmio is more precise. It calculates with the impressions this domain actually received rather than with the estimated volume of an external list, and it sees the long tail no external keyword set knows. On top of that comes AI visibility, which cannot appear in a pure SERP metric at all.
So the practical advice is: read Sistrix to place your own movement against the market. Read the Rankmio value to decide what to work on next, which is what the four pillars are built for. When the total drops, they show immediately which source is giving way.
Example: On 4 September 2026 example.com stands at 46 points. The pillars: SERP 41, citations 40, traffic 42, backlinks 76. That works out as 41 times 0.40 plus 40 times 0.25 plus 42 times 0.20 plus 76 times 0.15, giving 46. The SERP pillar rests on 1,623 search terms, 1,596 of them from Search Console and 27 from the position tracker; Bing accounts for 2 per cent of the visibility. The diagnosis is open to read: the link profile carries, the other three pillars sit mid-range, and the next work belongs where the share is largest, in SERP visibility.
Visibility index in the dashboard
Free SEO & GEO Check
SEO score, AI visibility and citability of your website in 30 seconds — no registration required.
Register for free, get 10 credits and start right away.
Register now